<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Parkinson - Miscellaneous ramblings of a web developer &#187; xbox 360</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daparky.com/tag/xbox-360/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daparky.com</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous ramblings of a web developer called David Parkinson. I work full time as a web developer but have interests in other things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Whats next after GTA IV?</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/whats-next-after-gta-iv/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/whats-next-after-gta-iv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battlefield bad company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand theft auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand theft auto iv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal gear solid 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After playing Grand Theft Auto IV since it&#8217;s release a week or two ago i&#8217;m alreaady looking into the future. I pre-ordered Metal Gear Solid 4 a while back (check out some MGS4 screenshots) and it is released on the 6th of June. I&#8217;ve pre-ordered another game, it&#8217;s a sport game, a sport i don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After playing Grand Theft Auto IV since it&#8217;s release a week or two ago i&#8217;m alreaady looking into the future. I pre-ordered <a href="http://daparky.com/ive-pre-ordered-2-aaa-ps3-games/" target="_self">Metal Gear Solid 4</a> a while back (check out some <a href="http://talkplaystation.com/8-new-metal-gear-solid-4-screenshots/" target="_blank">MGS4 screenshots</a>) and it is released on the 6th of June.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve pre-ordered another game, it&#8217;s a sport game, a sport i don&#8217;t particular like but i know i&#8217;ll enjoy the game. That game is called Top Spin 3. It cost £29.99 from Gameplay.co.uk, you can&#8217;t go wrong with it being that price. Take a look at some <a href="http://talkplaystation.com/10-new-top-spin-3-screenshots/" target="_blank">Top Spin 3 screenshots</a> and <a href="http://talkplaystation.com/top-spin-3-debut-trailer/" target="_blank">gameplay video</a>, the online side of things sound really fun. You can have doubles, double up with your friend against 2 other random people from around the world does it for me.</p>
<p>So whats after them 2 games? Battlefield Bad Company looks good, Haze is not a bad game. I guess i will continue to play GTA IV and hopefully i will complete it, i tend to not finish games and leave them.</p>
<p>My work colleagues are trying to pursuade me to get an Xbox 360 but they don&#8217;t offer the games i want and most of the games come out on the PC (i have a gaming quality PC) for example Gears of War, Halo 3 will make its way etc etc. So technically i&#8217;ve got an Xbox 360.</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=241&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/whats-next-after-gta-iv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifa 08 money tournament update league 5 and 6</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-update-league-5-and-6/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-update-league-5-and-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa 08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project gotham racing 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s re-cap and see what happened in league 5. The teams were: Liverpool (me) Blackburn (colleague 2) Manchester United (colleague 3) Barcelona (colleague 4) Manchester United came first, Liverpool came second, Blackburn came third and Barcelona came last. Manchester United and Liverpool made it to the cup final where Manchester United beat Liverpool. Not to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s re-cap and see what happened in <a href="http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-league-4-and-5/" target="_self">league 5</a>. The teams were:</p>
<ul>
<li>Liverpool (me)</li>
<li>Blackburn (colleague 2)</li>
<li>Manchester United (colleague 3)</li>
<li>Barcelona (colleague 4)</li>
</ul>
<p>Manchester United came first, Liverpool came second, Blackburn came third and Barcelona came last. Manchester United and Liverpool made it to the cup final where Manchester United beat Liverpool. Not to worry though because i said i want to use a team i&#8217;m good with and that&#8217;s Barcelona. So in league 6 i used Barcelona.</p>
<p>We have played league 6 and it&#8217;s the last league, we are giving Fifa 08 a break for now. League 6 looked like this:</p>
<ul>
<li>Barcelona (me)</li>
<li>Chelsea (colleague 2)</li>
<li>Manchester United (colleague 3)</li>
<li>Arsenal (colleague 4)</li>
</ul>
<p>What an interesting league this was. The two best players (me and colleague 3) drew against the two worst players in our first games. However, we won against the worse players in the rest of our games. Now then, the hardest part is playing potentially the best player, colleague 3. The first game Manchester United beat Barcelona with a lucky injury time goal. BUT i&#8217;m glad to say Barcelona THRASHED Manchester United in second time around by not 1-0, not 2-0 but 3-0! This gave me the lead and won on goal difference by 3 goals.</p>
<p>So the competition has ended and altogether i won: £55 which isn&#8217;t bad at all. All i can say is that i were the best at Fifa 08 and no one could come close to me apart from colleague 3 who i tactically outclassed him in our last game.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s happening next is we are switching game to Project Gotham Racing 4. The colleagues have the advantage over me because it&#8217;s on the Xbox 360, they all own one and i don&#8217;t, i prefer the PS3.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll have to see what happens.</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=204&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-update-league-5-and-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifa 08 money tournament league 4 and 5</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-league-4-and-5/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-league-4-and-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa 08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-league-4-and-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time for the Fifa 08 money tournament update again. I left the last post during league 4. League 4 Well, i didn&#8217;t win this league like i said i would, but i came second which i&#8217;m happy about. Hamburg SV (me) Chelsea (colleague 1) Sporting Lisbon (colleague 2) Barcelona (colleague 3) Chelsea finished top, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s that time for the Fifa 08 money tournament update again. I left the last <a href="http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-update/">post</a> during league 4.</p>
<p><strong>League 4</strong></p>
<p>Well, i didn&#8217;t win this league like i said i would, but i came second which i&#8217;m happy about.</p>
<ul>
<li>Hamburg SV (me)</li>
<li>Chelsea (colleague 1)</li>
<li>Sporting Lisbon (colleague 2)</li>
<li>Barcelona (colleague 3)</li>
</ul>
<p>Chelsea finished top, Hamburg second, Sporting Lisbon third and Barcelona fourth. The cup was a different story. I got knocked out in the first round and so did Sporting Lisbon. Guess who won the cup? Yes that&#8217;s right the colleague who has never won anything won the cup!</p>
<p>I have a few excuses to why i didn&#8217;t win the league or cup &#8211; i didn&#8217;t have a 5 star team so i didn&#8217;t have the pace of strength like Chelsea and Barcelona do.</p>
<p>We agreed that whoever comes top has to pick a 4 star team, second 4 and half star team, third and fourth 5 star teams. This makes it fair.</p>
<p>Anyway, i warned all colleagues that in league 5 i will be using a 4 and a half star team and i choose Liverpool.</p>
<p><strong>League 5</strong></p>
<p>League 5 will be an interesting one. It currently looks like this:</p>
<ul>
<li>Liverpool (me)</li>
<li>Blackburn (colleague 2)</li>
<li>Manchester United (colleague 3)</li>
<li>Barcelona (colleague 4)</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ve played a game and beat Blackburn 3-0.  Blackburn (colleague 2) gave me some stick when he beat me in the previous league and i just warned him that i used the wrong team &#8211; 4 stars! I thrashed Blackburn &#8211; enough said. Carrying on, Manchester United beat Barcelona 3-0, which leaves us joint first.</p>
<p>I might be able to win this league, i think i will struggle against Manchester United &#8211; Anything can happen in football.</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=157&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-league-4-and-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Game Review: Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Vegas 2</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/tom-clancys-rainbow-six-vegas-2-video-game-review/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/tom-clancys-rainbow-six-vegas-2-video-game-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainbow six vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainbow six vegas 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[split screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegas game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Game Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/tom-clancys-rainbow-six-vegas-2-video-game-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rainbow Six Vegas is back for another round! This time it&#8217;s better than ever with bug fixes, polished graphics and a spring button. But is it better than Call of Duty 4? Graphics &#8211; 8/10 The graphics in Rainbow Six Vegas 2 are nice, while they aren&#8217;t as good as Call of Duty 4, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rainbow Six Vegas is back for another round! This time it&#8217;s better than ever with bug fixes, polished graphics and a spring button. But is it better than Call of Duty 4?</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://daparky.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/rainbow-six-vegas-2.jpg" alt="Rainbow Six Vegas 2" /></p>
<p><strong>Graphics &#8211; 8/10</strong></p>
<p>The graphics in Rainbow Six Vegas 2 are nice, while they aren&#8217;t as good as Call of Duty 4, but still are eye catching. Graphically, they have improved over the first Rainbow Six Vegas game; they look crisper in comparison. The graphics won&#8217;t disappoint you in anyway unless you are running the game below 720P.</p>
<p><strong>Sound and Music &#8211; 7/10</strong></p>
<p>The sound and music in Vegas 2 is exactly the same as the first game. While there are bug fixes such as the constant gun fire, where no one is shooting but all you can hear is gun fire. The explosions sound nice, the voice acting is way better than the first which is good to hear.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s best to play with a surround sound system because of its tactical ability you need to listen out for where the foot steps are coming from.</p>
<p><strong>Gameplay &#8211; 8/10</strong></p>
<p>Rainbow Six Vegas 2 is not a run and gun type of game. Here you will require the use of tactics and stealth at the same time. You cannot simply run and shoot, you will get taken out in no time. One of the best features Vegas have is the cover system. Vegas contains one of the best cover system i&#8217;ve ever witnessed and its back for Vegas 2. You can use the cover system to move tactically from room to room.</p>
<p>The controls are easy to pick up and no different from the first game. It&#8217;s just annoying to get used to after playing Call of Duty 4 so much. You will be pressing the wrong buttons for the first few games you play.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://daparky.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/rainbow_six_vegas_02.jpg" alt="Rainbow Six Vegas 2 screenshot" /></p>
<p>In terms of controls Ubisoft have added a spring button which enables to run from location to location &#8211; something that was missing from the first game.</p>
<p>The single player campaign is pretty short, and won&#8217;t take any longer than 10 hours to complete. But once you have completed it on your own, you can go through the exact same campaign but with a friend. This is called Co-Op.</p>
<p>In Co-Op you and a friend can go through the whole story mode, the same story as you played it on single player. You can do this online and offline split screen or over LAN. Other co-op modes include terrorist hunt so there is plenty to do.</p>
<p>You can earn aces points and experience points (xp) in single player modes and the multiplayer online modes. It&#8217;s like Call of Duty 4 where you earn points for kills and winning rounds. These XP points can be used to unlock new weapons, gear and upgrades. The unlocks work in both offline and online. This adds an RPG style element similar to COD4.</p>
<p><strong>Multiplayer/Online &#8211; 9/10</strong></p>
<p>This is where you will probably spend most of you time &#8211; Online. Exactly the same as the first but with bug fixes and a new match making system makes it better than ever. Playing online is pretty much lag free and plays very smooth. There is one annoying thing and that is people playing music down their MICS!</p>
<p><strong>Replayability – 9/10</strong></p>
<p>Replayability is probably the best part of the game. There is so much to do and you will be coming back for more and more. I play co-op with my friends more than actually playing online competing. It&#8217;s so fun playing with friends through the story mode or terrorist hunt, discussing tactics over MICS.</p>
<p><strong>Overall – 8/10</strong></p>
<p>Not as good as Call of Duty 4 which many people had hoped. It is better than first Vegas, but doesn&#8217;t deliver anything entirely new apart from a spring button. That doesn&#8217;t mean you shouldn&#8217;t buy this game because if you loved the first Vegas you will love the second. It contains new maps and better graphics. It does feel like a rushed money spinning sequel but as soon as you load the game up you will say to yourself, Vegas is back!</p>
<p>if you liked the first one and its co-op online modes, i would highly recommend you buy this game now!</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=154&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/tom-clancys-rainbow-six-vegas-2-video-game-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifa 08 money tournament update</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-update/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa 08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I currently have 2 leagues and 3 cups to my name. You check previous results here. Basically me and my work colleagues play Fifa 08 on our lunch breaks, and put money in the pot for the winner to grab. I ended the previous post about Fifa 08 money tournament half way through league 3 and i will update [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently have 2 leagues and 3 cups to my name. You check previous results <a href="http://daparky.com/winning-money-on-fifa-08/" title="Fifa 08 money tournament">here</a>. Basically me and my work colleagues play Fifa 08 on our lunch breaks, and put money in the pot for the winner to grab. I ended the previous post about Fifa 08 money tournament half way through league 3 and i will update it in this post.</p>
<p><strong>League 3</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Italy (me)</li>
<li>England (colleague 1)</li>
<li>France (colleague 2)</li>
<li>Brazil (colleague 3)</li>
</ul>
<p>France won the league this time, Italy came second, England came 3rd and Brazil came last. While i lost the league i thought i would be giving colleague 2 £5. We all proceeded with the cup, and Italy won the cup so i didn&#8217;t have to give any money out because if you win the cup you don&#8217;t have to pay, you keep the £5 you put in the pot.</p>
<p><strong>League 4</strong></p>
<p>We started league 4, we said that the top 2 players in the last league (me and colleague 2) would be 4 star teams and the other rubbish players would be 5 star teams. League 4 looks like this&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>Hamburg SV (me)</li>
<li>Chelsea (colleague 1)</li>
<li>Sporting Lisbon (colleague 2)</li>
<li>Barcelona (colleague 3)</li>
</ul>
<p>So far we have all played twice. So i lost to Chelsea and beat Sporting Lisbon (the best player next to me). Sporting Lisbon has lost 1 and won 1 and Barcelona has lost both games. Chelsea have won both games up to now. So that leaves Chelsea top, Hamburg SV in second, Lisbon in 3rd and Barcelona last.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confident i will win this league again, i&#8217;m currently £45 up, i plan to stretch that to £60 and go on to win the cup.</p>
<p>If i don&#8217;t win the league, i might take the money and run.</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=127&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/fifa-08-money-tournament-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ve just pre-ordered Rainbow Six Vegas 2</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/ive-just-pre-ordered-rainbow-six-vegas-2/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/ive-just-pre-ordered-rainbow-six-vegas-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quidco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainbow six vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainbow six vegas 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/ive-just-pre-ordered-rainbow-six-vegas-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve spoken about this game before here and here. When i heard Rainbow Six Vegas 2 was announced i wasn&#8217;t excited at all because i thought it would be a money spinning sequal. What i liked about the first game was the fact that it featured co-op modes online and offline. Rainbow Six Vegas 2 is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spoken about this game before <a href="http://daparky.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-gameplay-footage/">here</a> and <a href="http://daparky.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-single-player-gameplay/">here</a>. When i heard Rainbow Six Vegas 2 was announced i wasn&#8217;t excited at all because i thought it would be a money spinning sequal. What i liked about the first game was the fact that it featured co-op modes online and offline. Rainbow Six Vegas 2 is supposed to feature even more co-op modes and co-op is the mode i played most on the previous game.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://daparky.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/rainbow-six-vegas-2.jpg" alt="Rainbow Six Vegas 2" /></p>
<p>I pre-ordered Rainbow Six Vegas 2 for the Playstation 3 from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gameplay.co.uk/" title="Gameplay UK">Gameplay.co.uk</a> through <a href="http://daparky.com/earn-cash-back-while-shopping-online/">Quidco</a> so i get 11% cashback. I used to purchase all my games from the high street shops, but it now works out cheaper to buy them online with cashback services and you get the game a day earlier. I also save money on petrol as i don&#8217;t have to drive down to the shops to purchase them. Anyway be sure to see a review from me when i get the game.</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=124&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/ive-just-pre-ordered-rainbow-six-vegas-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Game Review: Call of Duty 4</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/call-of-duty-4-video-game-review/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/call-of-duty-4-video-game-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call of duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first person shooters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Game Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/call-of-duty-4-video-game-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When i found out Call of Duty 4 was set in modern day times, i was really excited because i enjoyed playing the previous Call of Duty games set in World War 1 and 2. They did however, got very repetitive and i wanted to play a new game, a new phase and Call of Duty 4 did this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i found out Call of Duty 4 was set in modern day times, i was really excited because i enjoyed playing the previous Call of Duty games set in World War 1 and 2. They did however, got very repetitive and i wanted to play a new game, a new phase and Call of Duty 4 did this for me.</p>
<p><strong>Graphics &#8211; 9/10</strong></p>
<p>Call of Duty 4 looks absolutely brilliant. I&#8217;m running the game at its native 720p, running at 60fps with no frame drop issues. This is what you want in a game, a nice fast, smooth, fluid gameplay. A lot of first person shooters can&#8217;t deliver this, Call of Duty 4 certainly does.</p>
<p>In the singleplayer mode, you will find yourself stopping, and just staring at the beautiful graphics, looking at them from different perspectives. The character models look top notch along with the animation and this game has some of the best player animations i&#8217;ve seen in any game before. Everything looks so right. Your jaw will drop playing this game especially when you find yourself trying to dodge a helicopter from crash landing in front of you!</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://daparky.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/cod42.jpg" alt="Call of Duty 4 screenshot" /></p>
<p>Explosions and lighting effects have never looked better than this, rockets even show realistic trails behind them, bullets leave marks, the smoke looks real, and everything is real.</p>
<p>Multiplayer online graphics are toned down a little, probably to compensate lag. They still look brilliant online, but there is that extra detail removed. This is not to say, don&#8217;t play this online; you probably won&#8217;t even notice the changes much.</p>
<p>What Call of Duty 4 lives up to is the fact that some games never look as good as they do in the screenshots, this is where Call of Duty 4 wowed me because the graphics looks just like they do in the screenshots.</p>
<p>If you’re looking for a game that shows what this generation is all about, look no further than Call of Duty 4.</p>
<p><strong>Sound and Music &#8211; 9/10</strong></p>
<p>Sound and music in this game is very good. While playing this game you will think you’re in a real war with top notch sound effects of the explosions in the background, bullets whizzing past your head and soldiers screaming for help.</p>
<p>Weapons sound decent, with each gun having its own unique sound effects to it. There is not much to say about the sound in Call of Duty 4 apart from the fact it all sounds brilliant and real.</p>
<p>The music score is just the typical &#8216;war&#8217; like music; it&#8217;s nothing to keep you from the mute button. It just adds to the atmosphere of the game.</p>
<p>Voice acting it probably the best i&#8217;ve seen in a game, each soldier sounds different to one another and puts on a fantastic performance to say their lines.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m only playing this game through my T.V&#8217;s standard speakers; i would like to hear this game through a 5.1 surround sound system because it would sound awesome.</p>
<p><strong>Gameplay &#8211; 9/10</strong></p>
<p>In Call of Duty 4 you will find yourself fighting intense battles, sniping from long range, calling in airstrikes and raiding huts and buildings.</p>
<p>Enemies are a lot more intelligent, they will react to your actions, for example if you’re hiding behind some cover, they will toss and grenade over. This is clever stuff. Dogs are an addition to the enemies attacking power, these things run at you, and if they get you, it&#8217;s pretty difficult to shake them off. They kill you instantly. Enemies work together and will do everything they can do kill you. They will throw up smoke grenades, toss flash banks, and even shout for help.</p>
<p>The variety in levels is excellent and keeps the game away from being repetitive. In every level you will find yourself doing something new, from helping a sniper to rescuing a soldier.</p>
<p>In one of the levels you will find yourself firing from a gunship. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve seen gunship videos on YouTube, and Call of Duty 4 is very good at emulating this, it&#8217;s what you would expect when arming a gunship.</p>
<p>There are some downfalls in the singleplayer campaign which i didn&#8217;t like. One of which is that there seems to be an unlimited amount of spawns for the enemy, unless you make it to the next checkpoint, the enemies will keep on coming. Once you do get to the next checkpoint, whatever you just did is long forgotten, the war behind you is gone. It&#8217;s very linear.</p>
<p>Playing through the singleplayer campaign is pretty short and is over within hours. I wish it wouldn&#8217;t have ended so early; i was very disappointed with the game ending so early.</p>
<p><strong>Multiplayer/Online &#8211; 9/10</strong></p>
<p>You will spend most of your time playing online. You start off on a low level and you have to work your way up to unlock new game types and new equipment/weapons.</p>
<p>The maximum level you can reach is 55, but it doesn&#8217;t end there, you have the choice to stay at the current level or restart all over again and go back down to rank 1. There are a lot of achievements to achieve for example, killing 50 soldiers with a pistol. Achieving these will add to your stats and experience points.</p>
<p>One thing i liked about the online aspect of the game is the ability to create your own class rather than sticking to a preset class. You can assign different weapons with different classes. Perk is a new addition where you unlock new abilities such as have more health, stronger fire power and increase running strength. You will unlock more as you gain more experience points. You are however limited to how many Perks you can set, as it wouldn&#8217;t be fun if you could assign all the Perks in the game to your soldier.</p>
<p>You can some nice bonuses for killing for example, 3 players in a row will give you the ability to use a UAV to locate enemies on the map for your team.</p>
<p>Lag isn&#8217;t an issue online, and runs at 60fps just like in singleplayer. You will feel like you’re playing singleplayer because the game runs so well online.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://daparky.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/cod41.jpg" alt="Call of Duty 4 screenshot 2" /></p>
<p>There are several game mode online and include the classic Free for All and team deathmatch. Other game modes are Search and Destroy where 1 team plants the bomb, the other teams stops the bomb from going off. Domination which is kind of like capture the flag, but instead they are positions on the map, you must take over these positions and the team with the most points win. You get more points for the most controlled positions. Other game modes such as 1 on 1 cage and Old School match ups you will not bother with because no one plays these game modes.</p>
<p>There are some very annoying this in online, one of the most annoying is when people are playing music and all you can hear is music, this really does my head in. Same again with people talking all the time rather than discussing tactics and strategies. If you want to have a good game it&#8217;s best to get your friends online or find a server with no microphones enabled.</p>
<p><strong>Replayability – 8/10</strong></p>
<p>You will probably play through the single player twice before getting bored of it, or you might play through your favourite level again. Upon completing the game, it unlocks an arcade mode where you’re placed in the battlefield and you rack points up for killing soldiers.</p>
<p>Online is what you will be coming back for. It&#8217;s very addictive playing online when you can&#8217;t wait until you have unlocked your next weapon because each weapon unlock gets better and better. You will not get bored of the online part of the game any time soon.</p>
<p><strong>Overall – 8.9/10</strong></p>
<p>Call of Duty 4 is like a brand new game with it not being set in the world war phase. The gameplay is easy to pickup and play; it&#8217;s not very hard to control. The graphics are jaw dropping packed with good sound effects.</p>
<p>Singleplayer campaign is over before you know it, but online is where this game belongs; you will be coming back for more and more online action. This is truly the next generation first person shooter you should own and i&#8217;m looking forwards to the next chapter in the Call of Duty franchise. If you haven’t bought this game yet, go out and buy it now!</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=100&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/call-of-duty-4-video-game-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battlefield: Bad Company gameplay videos</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/battlefield-bad-company-gameplay-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/battlefield-bad-company-gameplay-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battlefield bad company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call of duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/battlefield-bad-company-gameplay-videos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battlefield franchise is a kick ass one, i&#8217;ve spent a lot of time playing Battlefield, Battlefield 2 being the one i&#8217;ve played most, and is my favourite out of the lot. Will we see a next generation Battlefield game? Yes we will and it&#8217;s called Battlefield: Bad Company and will only be available for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Battlefield franchise is a kick ass one, i&#8217;ve spent a lot of time playing Battlefield, Battlefield 2 being the one i&#8217;ve played most, and is my favourite out of the lot. Will we see a next generation Battlefield game? Yes we will and it&#8217;s called Battlefield: Bad Company and will only be available for the Playstation 3 and Xbox 360.</p>
<p>Playing Bad Company on a console will be a little wierd for me at first because i&#8217;m used to playing the franchise on the PC with a mouse and keyboard. This doesn&#8217;t bother me at the moment because i probably don&#8217;t have a powerful enough PC to run it, if it did appear on the PC. I&#8217;m good at Call of Duty 4 on the PS3, so i&#8217;m guessing i&#8217;ll be good at this too.</p>
<p>One noticeable new addition to Bad Company is destructible environments. Yes thats right, no more hiding behind a wall for cover because someone will just blow a hole in it and then be able to get you. I&#8217;m looking forwards to this new addition, although i have witnessed it before in a game called Red Faction, you were able to blow chunks out of walls, but very limiting. Bad Company promises 90% destructible environments and this creates opportunities to try new tactics and strategies.</p>
<p>Vehicles are still here and if you driving a tank you will be able to blow a house down in no time. I&#8217;m really looking forwards to this one. Is it a game that will beat Call of Duty 4? We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>Here are some gameplay videos, direct from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gametrailers.com/player/31248.html" title="Battlefield: Bad Company on gametrailers">Gametrailers.com</a></p>
<p>Field of Fury Gameplay:<br />
<object id="gtembed" width="480" height="409">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=31248"/>
<param name="quality" value="high" /> 
<embed src="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=31248" name="gtembed" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" quality="high"  type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="409"></embed> </object></p>
<p>Riverbank Gameplay:<br />
<object id="gtembed" width="480" height="409">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=31246"/>
<param name="quality" value="high" /> 
<embed src="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=31246" name="gtembed" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" quality="high"  type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="409"></embed> </object></p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=82&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/battlefield-bad-company-gameplay-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wardevil Playstation 3 in game screenshots</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/wardevil-ps3-in-game-screenshots/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/wardevil-ps3-in-game-screenshots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screenshots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/wardevil-playstation-3-in-game-screenshots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just browsing around Playstation Universe and bumped into what looks like a breathtaking game &#8211; Wardevil for the Playstation 3. Check out the screenshots, the graphics look absolutely brilliant. Then again, people say graphics don&#8217;t mean anything, True. Can the gameplay live up to the graphics? Only time will tell. Anyway, heres are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just browsing around <a target="_blank" href="http://www.psu.com" title="Playstation Universe">Playstation Universe</a> and bumped into what looks like a breathtaking game &#8211; Wardevil for the Playstation 3. Check out the screenshots, the graphics look absolutely brilliant. Then again, people say graphics don&#8217;t mean anything, True. Can the gameplay live up to the graphics? Only time will tell.</p>
<p>Anyway, heres are the screenshots&#8230;(click to enlarge)</p>
<p><a rel="lightbox" target="_blank" href="http://www.psu.com/media/articles/wardevil_new_01.jpg"><img border="0" width="500" src="http://www.psu.com/media/articles/wardevil_new_01_small.jpg" alt="Wardevil Screenshot 01" height="281" /></a></p>
<p><a rel="lightbox" target="_blank" href="http://www.psu.com/media/articles/wardevil_new_02.jpg"><img border="0" width="500" src="http://www.psu.com/media/articles/wardevil_new_02_small.jpg" alt="Wardevil Screenshot 01" height="281" /></a></p>
<p><a rel="lightbox" target="_blank" href="http://www.psu.com/media/articles/wardevil_new_03.jpg"><img border="0" width="500" src="http://www.psu.com/media/articles/wardevil_new_03_small.jpg" alt="Wardevil Screenshot 01" height="281" /></a></p>
<p>Looks like Dynasty Warriors but set far in the future.</p>
<p>More information on the game at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.psu.com/PSU--New-Wardevil-Screenshots-and-details--a0002738-p0.php">Playstation Universe</a>.</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=23&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/wardevil-ps3-in-game-screenshots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost Odyssey Cities Trailer</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/lost-odyssey-cities-trailer/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/lost-odyssey-cities-trailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gametrailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/lost-odyssey-cities-trailer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks in one word &#8211; fantastic! although i did expect something new even though it&#8217;s made by the creator of the final fantasy series who now works for MistWalker. MistWalker is basically a Microsoft backed company, and people say it loses it&#8217;s touch, same thing happened with Blue Dragon. Anyway, here is the trailer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks in one word &#8211; fantastic! although i did expect something new even though it&#8217;s made by the creator of the final fantasy series who now works for MistWalker. MistWalker is basically a Microsoft backed company, and people say it loses it&#8217;s touch, same thing happened with Blue Dragon.</p>
<p>Anyway, here is the trailer for Lost Odyssey Cities:<br />
<object id="gtembed" width="480" height="409">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=30433"/>
<param name="quality" value="high" /> 
<embed src="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=30433" name="gtembed" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" quality="high"  type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="409"></embed> </object></p>
<p>Final Fantasy meets Shadow Hearts anyone?<br />
Looks very nice, but is that in game or is it just CG? Looks very similar to Final Fantasy VII.</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=15&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/lost-odyssey-cities-trailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rainbow Six Vegas 2 gameplay footage</title>
		<link>http://daparky.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-gameplay-footage/</link>
		<comments>http://daparky.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-gameplay-footage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gametrailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daparky.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-gameplay-footage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a big fan of the tactical shooter Rainbow Six franchise, Rainbow Six Rogue Spear being my favourite. I got Rainbow Six Vegas for the Playstation 3 with high expectations and i enjoyed the game alot, the replayability and the offline co-op makes me say i want the next Rainbow Six game which Vegas 2. Here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of the tactical shooter Rainbow Six franchise, Rainbow Six Rogue Spear being my favourite. I got Rainbow Six Vegas for the Playstation 3 with high expectations and i enjoyed the game alot, the replayability and the offline co-op makes me say i want the next Rainbow Six game which Vegas 2.</p>
<p>Here is some Vegas 2 gameplay footage:</p>
<p><object id="gtembed" width="480" height="409">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=30440"/>
<param name="quality" value="high" /> 
<embed src="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?mid=30440" name="gtembed" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" quality="high"  type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="409"></embed> </object></p>
<p>Will it be better than Call of Duty 4? Judging from the above gameplay footage, it looks exactly the same as the first, no new features are anything, just new levels. I will probably buy this game because i loved the first one.</p>
<img src="http://daparky.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=6&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daparky.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-gameplay-footage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

